H O T   T O P I C S
Standards: Here Today, Here Tomorrow
Sept. 2001
Successful standards-based reform depends on clear standards, well-crafted tests, and fair accountability. Officials from Achieve offer strategies to help educators put these critical pieces in place.

Assessment and Accountability Across the 50 States
May 2001
Throughout the U.S., policymakers have adopted accountability plans in response to concerns about student performance. How do they compare? How are they being supported? This CPRE policy brief explores the issues.

Defining "Failure" Critical to Bush Testing Plan
May 16, 2001
President Bush has pledged to get tough on schools that are failing to educate their students.  But how do you determine when schools are "failing"?

Test Prep
March 2001
Poor, urban school districts have the most to lose from state accountability measures, but most resistance is found in rich suburban areas. This article looks at Mass. to find out why.

 

Comments? Suggestions? We'd like to hear from you.

 

BACK

Mathematics and Science
Research
News and Editorials

Model Mathematics Standards (Arizona and Japan)
Achieve (2001)
Based on criteria developed by many independent, nationally recognized education experts and educators, Achieve has identified the Mathematics standards from Arizona and Japan as the best examples of Math standards currently in use.  Though these standards are not flawless, they are among the best examples available against which states and communities can compare themselves.  View these standards side-by-side using Achieve's standards database.
Achieve's Criteria for Benchmarking Standards

The Nation's Report Card: Mathematics Highlights from 2000
(.pdf format)
Get Acrobat Reader
National Center for Education Statistics (2001)
This full-color publication uses a tabloid format to present highlights from "The Nation's Report Card: Mathematics 2000." It describes the assessment content, presents major findings, and provides information about practices at home and in school that are related to mathematics achievement. This publication also includes sample test questions and examples of student responses.

TIMSS Resource Page from the AFT
American Federation of Teachers (2000)
Released in 1997,  the Third International Mathematics and Science Study presented the U.S. and the rest of the world with some of the most comprehensive international educational comparisons to date.  The AFT's resource page presents news, research, policy reports and editorials pertaining to the TIMSS study and its impact on the way we view our education system, subject standards and the way we teach.

Improving Mathematics Education Using Results from NAEP and TIMSS (.pdf format) Get Acrobat Reader
Linda D. Wilson and Rolf K. Blank (1999)
In 1997, two major studies, the National Assessment of Educational Progress and the Third International Mathematics and Science Study, were released. These studies have helped provide a wealth of information regarding student knowledge and performance in mathematics. This paper serves as an analysis of those studies concerning the performance strengths and weaknesses of American students. It attempts to explain the wide differences in mathematics proficiency among our schools. It also summarizes some of the major differences between these studies, as well as state assessment programs, in their purpose and design.

Knowing and Teaching Elementary Mathematics
by Richard Askey
Published in American Educator (1999)

In this article, Askey reviews a book of the same title as the article written by Chinese mathematics teacher Liping Ma.  Ma's book examines the ways in which Chinese mathematics teachers approach teaching complex subjects as compared to teachers in the United States, providing illustrations that help show how the topic under consideration fits into the larger picture of elementary mathematics.

Basic Skills Versus Conceptual Understanding
by Hung-Hsi Wu
Published in American Educator
(1999)
In this article, University of California at Berkeley mathematics professor Hung-Hsi Wu, examines the debate between teaching "basic skills" mathematics or emphasizing conceptual understanding in mathematics, arguing that both are necessary in the end.  

Setting Higher Sights: A Need for More Demanding Assessments for U.S. Eight Graders
American Federation of Teachers
(1998)
As American students progress through elementary school, they fall more and more below the international level of academic competency. In this report, conducted by the AFT, the focus is on the inability of American public schools, as compared to foreign school systems, to provide a high level of standards for students. The report suggests the competency level of assessment tests be heightened so teachers, parents and students can raise the benchmark of American standards to the world’s elite.

Every Child Mathematically Proficient: An Action Plan
Learning First Alliance (1998)
How can we bring American students to world class levels of achievement in mathematics? The Learning First Alliance tackles such a question in their 1998 action plan. The extensive plan covers many topics such as improving student achievement and closing the existing racial/socioeconomic performance gaps. Objectives involving four key areas (curriculum changes, teacher training, public support, and research-based reforms) are discussed and step by step recommendations are included.

The Formula for Success: A Business Leader’s Guide to Supporting Math and Science Achievement
Business Coalition for Education Reform (1998)
According to recent studies, children today assume that there is no reason why they should strive for excellence in school. This, though, may be a dangerous assumption considering that "almost 90% of new jobs require more than a high school level of literacy and math skills." In this report, the Business Coalition for Education Reform continues its aim to illustrate the value of math and science mastery in the workplace. It addresses the TIMSS findings and offers models that enable business and education leaders to support achievement strategies.

Learning from the TIMSS: Results from the Third International Mathematics and Science Study
National Research Council (1997)

What exactly is the Third International Mathematics and Science Study and what does it mean for our schools? In 1997, a symposium was held to answer these questions and to initiate a discussion in hopes of advancing reform. This conference summary opens with a detailed look at the very complex nature of TIMSS. It also includes questions that were raised about the study and certain policy issues that were addressed. The symposium’s major themes are also presented.

Executive Summary: What Students Abroad Are Expected to Know About Mathematics (Exams from France, Germany and Japan)
American Federation of Teachers (1997)

This 1997 report by the AFT and the National Center for Improving Science Education (NCISE) shows much larger percentages of students in France, Germany, and Japan taking and passing demanding math exams than their American Counterparts. The report examines the French brevet, the German Realschule exam, and the Tokyo prefecture high school entrance exam.  Also compared are the various college entrance examinations administered in each country: the French baccalaureat, the German Abitur, the Tokyo University entrance examination and the SAT I, AP, and SAT II exams.

New AFT/NCISE Report Highlights Differences in Science Achievement Here and Abroad (Press Release)
American Federation of Teachers (1996)

The AFT/NCISE report, What College-Bound Students Abroad Are Expeceted to Know About Chemistry and Physics, illustrates how an integrated system of a common curriculum, exams based on that curriculum, and incentives for students lead to substantial proportions of students mastering demanding material.

Principles and Standards for School Mathematics
National Council for Teachers of Mathematics (2000)

National Science Education Standards
National Research Council (1996)

Science Framework for the 1996 National Assessment of Education Progress

Mathematics Framework for the 1996 National Assessment of Education Progress

Benchmarks for Science Literacy
American Association for the Advancement of Science (1993)

 

                                  

 

        Top of Page | Home | Links | Search This Site
        About Us | About Albert Shanker | Education | Labor | Democracy
Standards Homepage