Skip to:

What About Curriculum Effects?

Comments

Barak Rosenshine assumes that the Math standardized achievement tests were equally fair to the two curricula. Such tests are usually planned to be independent of particular curricula but there is always a risk that they are not. How recently were the tests standarized? How new were the two curricula? Maybe newer "fashions" in curriculum inclusions render particular older standarized tests inappropriate. Pity the poor teachers who risk victimization due to these types of mismatches!

All well and good, but I don't see the effect of curricula significant for using value-added in teacher evaluation. Teachers are evaluated within administrative unit contexts (school, or school district) and those have uniform curricula throughout. And if a teacher uses his or her own curriculum instead of the school-wide or district-wide, I see no reason why he or she should not be held responsible for that selection too. But I would like very much to see also whole schools and whole school-districts held accountable for their unit-wide value-added scores. Perhaps this will finally induce them to pay attention to selecting effective curricula, rather than running after some fashionable curriculum du jour.

DISCLAIMER

This web site and the information contained herein are provided as a service to those who are interested in the work of the Albert Shanker Institute (ASI). ASI makes no warranties, either express or implied, concerning the information contained on or linked from shankerblog.org. The visitor uses the information provided herein at his/her own risk. ASI, its officers, board members, agents, and employees specifically disclaim any and all liability from damages which may result from the utilization of the information provided herein. The content in the Shanker Blog may not necessarily reflect the views or official policy positions of ASI or any related entity or organization.