Skip to:

Still In Residence: Arts Education In U.S. Public Schools


Great post. I'm old enough to be a veteran of the 80s-90s arts wars: Jesse Helms, the NEA, all that. Those times forced the arts community and the arts education industry to build an advocacy infrastructure that exists even today. MENC (now NAME) had to make advocacy a core part of its mission. Of course, it helps that NAMM and other music industry sectors were looking to lose a ton of money if they didn't support music ed. The debate is largely over: in reformy circles, you almost never hear the cries from back in the day to "get back to basics." People understand it's important. This gives me hope. The conversation can change.

Nice post. It strikes me that schools have an incentive to report more art than there is given the basic discourse that art education is good. Every school I have worked in has cut back art and other electives. In most cases, this was done without eliminating the classes entirely. Is there a survey of teachers examining their self-reported experiences with changes in art education at their schools? I think it is worth asking what one might reveal. That said, I think almost everyone agrees art is a positive and so most schools will continue to resist severely cutting basic art education.


This web site and the information contained herein are provided as a service to those who are interested in the work of the Albert Shanker Institute (ASI). ASI makes no warranties, either express or implied, concerning the information contained on or linked from The visitor uses the information provided herein at his/her own risk. ASI, its officers, board members, agents, and employees specifically disclaim any and all liability from damages which may result from the utilization of the information provided herein. The content in the Shanker Blog may not necessarily reflect the views or official policy positions of ASI or any related entity or organization.