Skip to:

Pay Equity In Higher Education

Comments

Rick, I make the exact same point. Unfortunately the AAUP data that are publicly available do not permit a more nuanced examination. I make no claims about the size of the effect - I can't with these data anyways. When I say "important differences in earnings" I am referring to the existing literature on this issue. I also think they are important simply because, over the course of a lifetime, even small differences accumulate. I am most interested in the mechanisms that explain both occupational segregation and the gender wage gap – i.e., the social psychological literature on gender stereotypes. Thank you for your comment.

First, assuming academics are a good example of a meritocracy is charming - in the same way multicolored unicorns are charming. But the bigger point is that you do not account in any way for the gender and pay differences between disciplines. There are probably many more men in engineering (or even business) departments working at higher pay than say, history, that might have an even distribution of men and women, but overall lower average pay. If this bias is not accounted for, the results of your analysis are weakened. I know you mention this problem but you do not provide any numbers that indicate how strong this factor is in your data. You claim it is relatively small, but my intuition tells me otherwise. We need these numbers to take your work as a meaningful measure of gender bias.

If you are making the same point as I, then I am not sure the point of your piece. I am saying the data is meaningless as analyzed, yet you use the data to infer. It is impossible to compare salaries outside departments. The big factor is starting salary level - quite different when comparing English and Chemical Engineering. And then many other factors create large differences - not the least is the effectiveness of the department chair or college dean in negotiating with the upper administration. And then there is favoritism, artificial measures of productivity, perception, PR and of course, residual sexism and racism. It will take some serious work to unravel details.

DISCLAIMER

This web site and the information contained herein are provided as a service to those who are interested in the work of the Albert Shanker Institute (ASI). ASI makes no warranties, either express or implied, concerning the information contained on or linked from shankerblog.org. The visitor uses the information provided herein at his/her own risk. ASI, its officers, board members, agents, and employees specifically disclaim any and all liability from damages which may result from the utilization of the information provided herein. The content in the Shanker Blog may not necessarily reflect the views or official policy positions of ASI or any related entity or organization.